Indicator noise

Topic Core indicator DPSIR Main topic
Noise Impact

External noise-related costs

Excessive noise is harmful to health. However, the associated costs – for example, for medical treatment – are not covered by those who cause the noise (road users, etc.), but instead have to be borne by those whose health is damaged by it. The same applies to the reduced value of properties due to excessive noise – here, it is the owners who have to bear the losses. Costs that are not borne by those who cause them are referred to as “external costs”.

Assessment of the state
poor poor
Assessment of the trend
negative negative
Directly related to health problems 2019: 1569 Nuisance (measured in terms of property depreciation) 2019: 1261 Directly related to health problems 2018: 1568 Nuisance (measured in terms of property depreciation) 2018: 1245 Directly related to health problems 2017: 1502 Nuisance (measured in terms of property depreciation) 2017: 1225 Directly related to health problems 2016: 1470 Nuisance (measured in terms of property depreciation) 2016: 1197 Directly related to health problems 2015: 1436 Nuisance (measured in terms of property depreciation) 2015: 1174 Directly related to health problems 2013: 1365 Nuisance (measured in terms of property depreciation) 2013: 1088 Directly related to health problems 2010: 1287 Nuisance (measured in terms of property depreciation) 2010: 1039 Directly related to health problems 2009: 143 Nuisance (measured in terms of property depreciation) 2009: 1204 Directly related to health problems 2007: 131 Nuisance (measured in terms of property depreciation) 2007: 1122 Directly related to health problems 2006: 126 Nuisance (measured in terms of property depreciation) 2006: 1085 Directly related to health problems 2005: 123 Nuisance (measured in terms of property depreciation) 2005: 1051
* New methods and data bases lead to higher noise costs from 2010

Data for the graph: Excel
Source: ARE; FOEN
Comment

External road, railway and air traffic noise costs in Switzerland amount to more than 2.8 billion Swiss francs a year. Due to a change in the methodology used, this value is not directly comparable with those recorded in previous years. However, the rising trend that emerged in the preceding years continues. For this reason the development is assessed as negative.

Direct harm to health accounts for approximately 55% of these costs (especially ischaemic heart diseases, health problems associated with high blood pressure, out-patient treatment, hospitalisation, reduction of life expectancy, etc.). The remaining 45% of the costs are attributable to loss of value of real estate. Road transport accounts for 80% of the overall noise-related costs.

 

Financial incentives from which those who cause noise can benefit if they reduce noise levels are the most suitable method of reducing external costs. Other instruments such as increasing market transparency are also feasible, alongside financial incentives such as oil tax and noise-related take-off and landing charges.

International comparison

International studies of external costs have been carried out in other European countries. The external noise-related costs are significantly higher in Switzerland than in other European countries. This difference is largely attributable to the high population density and high price level in Switzerland.

Method

External noise-related costs are mainly calculated with the aid of hedonic pricing methodologies. For the monetarisation of direct harm to health the following impacts are taken into account:

  • Costs of medical treatment (hospitalisation, visits to doctors, medicaments)
  • Loss of production (absence of employees)
  • Costs of replacing deceased employees
  • Intangible costs (loss of wellbeing; pain and suffering on the part of affected persons, identified via willingness of the population to pay).

Basis for monetarisation is a study carried out in Switzerland in 2010 concerning exposure to road and railway noise, plus the Swiss noise database, sonBASE.

Basis for assessment of the trend
Targeted trend Initial value Final value Variation in % Observed trend Assessment
Decrease 2010 2019 21.67% Growth negative
 
Last updated on: 30.06.2022

Further information

Links

inidkatoren_hirun

Indicators

Search and list of all indicators

https://www.bafu.admin.ch/content/bafu/en/home/themen/thema-laerm/laerm--daten--indikatoren-und-karten/laerm--indikatoren/indikator-laerm.pt.html/aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuaW5kaWthdG9yZW4uYWRtaW4uY2gvUHVibG/ljL0FlbURldGFpbD9pbmQ9TFIwMTEmbG5nPWVu.html