Drought and groundwater

Switzerland is rich in water, but climate change is changing this. Droughts not only affect vegetation and rivers, but also groundwater. The FOEN monitors the effects of drought on Switzerland's natural groundwater bodies and helps to develop sustainable strategies for managing these valuable resources.

Reduced groundwater recharge during droughts

Groundwater is naturally recharged by precipitation, snowmelt and rivers. The water permeates the ground and fills the cavities in porous or fractured rock formations, which serve as aquifers.

During droughts, however, significantly less precipitation falls over several weeks, reducing groundwater recharge. For this reason, groundwater resources that are predominantly fed by precipitation are more affected by droughts than resources with additional river water infiltration. Rivers carrying meltwater are particularly important for such groundwater resources, as melting snow and glaciers in spring and summer contribute to the formation of new groundwater and can thus mitigate the effects of drought. However, if rivers also carry little or no water during long periods of drought and heat, the additional groundwater recharge from river water also ceases.

Hoher und niedriger Quellabfluss
High and low spring discharge

The extent to which drought affects groundwater quantity also depends on the natural properties of the subsurface, as well as the depth and thickness of the groundwater aquifer. The principal groundwater resources that react sensitively to drought are:

  • Localised, i.e. very limited in terms of space, unconsolidated groundwater reserves with or without a connection to small watercourses with a pluvial groundwater regime in the Jura mountains and Swiss Plateau
  • Local groundwater reserves in the molasse rock of the Swiss Plateau and in the karst of the Jura mountains and the northern and southern Pre-Alps

These regions recorded new lows in groundwater levels and spring discharges during the dry summer of 2018, as shown in the map below.

2018 drought – Regions with restrictions due to water scarcity compared with QUANT monitoring sites
2018 drought – Regions with restrictions due to water scarcity compared with QUANT monitoring sites with low and record low groundwater levels and spring discharge

Important groundwater functions in dry periods

In low-flow conditions, it may no longer be the watercourses that feed the groundwater, but the groundwater that feeds the watercourses. Sufficient groundwater is therefore essential to maintain the low-flow discharge of small and medium-sized watercourses. Similarly, groundwater-dependent terrestrial ecosystems, such as wet meadows, moors and floodplain forests, depend on the presence of groundwater close to the surface. It has been shown that these ecosystems are more severely affected by dry periods than our water supply, which can draw on deeper groundwater resources in such times.

During droughts, more groundwater is used for agricultural irrigation, cooling and drinking water supply. This additional extraction increases the pressure on groundwater resources and can have a greater regional impact on groundwater reserves than the direct effects of climate change. This is usually not a problem for short periods, since droughts usually affect groundwater only after a few days or weeks. However, it can become a problem if the drought lasts longer than a few weeks or recurs over several years. This can lead to long-term groundwater depletion.

Monitoring groundwater

Climate change is expected to lead to longer and more frequent dry spells, making nationwide monitoring of the effects on groundwater indispensable. As part of Switzerland's national groundwater monitoring programme (NAQUA), groundwater volume and temperature are monitored continuously at around 100 sites.

The following FOEN indicators provide information on the state and development of groundwater, particularly during dry periods (low groundwater levels and low spring discharge, or high groundwater temperatures):

High 2023: 27 Normal 2023: 46 Low 2023: 27 High 2022: 12 Normal 2022: 57 Low 2022: 31 High 2021: 35 Normal 2021: 50 Low 2021: 15 High 2020: 21 Normal 2020: 53 Low 2020: 26 High 2019: 17 Normal 2019: 51 Low 2019: 32 High 2018: 17 Normal 2018: 51 Low 2018: 32 High 2017: 7 Normal 2017: 63 Low 2017: 30 High 2016: 25 Normal 2016: 59 Low 2016: 16 High 2015: 12 Normal 2015: 72 Low 2015: 16 High 2014: 20 Normal 2014: 75 Low 2014: 5 High 2013: 21 Normal 2013: 75 Low 2013: 4 High 2012: 16 Normal 2012: 72 Low 2012: 12 High 2011: 4 Normal 2011: 63 Low 2011: 33 High 2010: 14 Normal 2010: 59 Low 2010: 27 High 2009: 13 Normal 2009: 67 Low 2009: 20 High 2008: 19 Normal 2008: 69 Low 2008: 12 High 2007: 24 Normal 2007: 62 Low 2007: 14 High 2006: 23 Normal 2006: 50 Low 2006: 27 High 2005: 9 Normal 2005: 43 Low 2005: 48 High 2004: 9 Normal 2004: 66 Low 2004: 25 High 2003: 15 Normal 2003: 49 Low 2003: 36 High 2002: 30 Normal 2002: 60 Low 2002: 10 High 2001: 48 Normal 2001: 48 Low 2001: 4 High 2000: 29 Normal 2000: 62 Low 2000: 9 High 1999: 41 Normal 1999: 47 Low 1999: 12 High 1998: 9 Normal 1998: 47 Low 1998: 44 High 1997: 8 Normal 1997: 61 Low 1997: 31 High 1996: 10 Normal 1996: 63 Low 1996: 27 High 1995: 37 Normal 1995: 48 Low 1995: 15
Percentage of monitoring stations at which low, normal and high groundwater levels and/or spring discharge rates were recorded in each year.

Data for the graph: Excel
Source: Federal Office for the Environment

Low 2023: 3 Normal 2023: 44 High 2023: 53 Low 2022: 4 Normal 2022: 61 High 2022: 35 Low 2021: 4 Normal 2021: 69 High 2021: 27 Low 2020: 2 Normal 2020: 52 High 2020: 46 Low 2019: 7 Normal 2019: 51 High 2019: 42 Low 2018: 3 Normal 2018: 51 High 2018: 46 Low 2017: 10 Normal 2017: 62 High 2017: 28 Low 2016: 13 Normal 2016: 56 High 2016: 31 Low 2015: 4 Normal 2015: 66 High 2015: 30 Low 2014: 14 Normal 2014: 78 High 2014: 8 Low 2013: 12 Normal 2013: 82 High 2013: 6 Low 2012: 8 Normal 2012: 81 High 2012: 11 Low 2011: 5 Normal 2011: 87 High 2011: 8 Low 2010: 16 Normal 2010: 79 High 2010: 5 Low 2009: 14 Normal 2009: 80 High 2009: 6 Low 2008: 9 Normal 2008: 78 High 2008: 13 Low 2007: 12 Normal 2007: 72 High 2007: 16 Low 2006: 43 Normal 2006: 52 High 2006: 5 Low 2005: 19 Normal 2005: 67 High 2005: 14 Low 2004: 18 Normal 2004: 63 High 2004: 18 Low 2003: 4 Normal 2003: 84 High 2003: 12 Low 2002: 0 Normal 2002: 92 High 2002: 8 Low 2001: 0 Normal 2001: 90 High 2001: 10 Low 2000: 9 Normal 2000: 91 High 2000: 0
Percentage of measuring sites recording low, normal and high groundwater temperatures during the year in question.

Data for the graph: Excel
Source: FOEN

Further information

Contact
Last modification 26.11.2024

Top of page

https://www.bafu.admin.ch/content/bafu/en/home/topics/water/groundwater/groundwater-resources/trockenheit.html